Checklist peer review research paper

This checklist can be used when you are preparing your draft final project for peer review and when you are commenting on drafts.

Checklist peer review research paper

Scope of the journal The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Medical oncology, radiation oncology, medical imaging, radiation protection, non-ionising radiation, radiobiology.

Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference. The Editorial Process A manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics alone at that point in time and has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere.

The journal expects that authors would authorize one of them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged. On submission, editors review all submitted manuscripts initially for suitability for formal review. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are rejected before proceeding for formal peer-review.

Manuscripts that are unlikely to be of interest to the Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics readers are also liable to be rejected at this stage itself. Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics are sent to two or more expert reviewers.

During submission, the contributor is requested to provide names of two or three qualified reviewers who have had experience in the subject of the submitted manuscript, but this is not mandatory.

However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion of the editor. Every manuscript is also assigned to a member of the editorial team, who based on the comments from the reviewers takes a final decision on the manuscript.

This process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript.

Evaluating Internet Research Sources

Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding author. The corresponding author is expected to return the corrected proofs within three days.

It may not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process of submission of the manuscript to final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed online. Clinical trial registry Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics favors registration of clinical trials and is a signatory to the Statement on publishing clinical trials in Indian biomedical journals.

Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics would publish clinical trials that have been registered with a clinical trial registry that allows free online access to public.

Before sending a manuscript contributors are requested to check for the latest instructions available. Instructions are also available from the website of the journal http:
Using Search Engines Wisely!
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics : Instructions for authors Whenever possible quantify findings and present them with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty such as confidence intervals.

Registration in the following trial registers is acceptable: This is applicable to clinical trials that have begun enrollment of subjects in or after June Clinical trials that have commenced enrollment of subjects prior to June would be considered for publication in Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics only if they have been registered retrospectively with clinical trial registry that allows unhindered online access to public without charging any fees.

Authorship Criteria Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to each of the three components mentioned below: Concept and design of study or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and Final approval of the version to be published.

Participation solely in the acquisition of funding or the collection of data does not justify authorship.

Checklist peer review research paper

General supervision of the research group is not sufficient for authorship. Each contributor should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of the manuscript.

The order of naming the contributors should be based on the relative contribution of the contributor towards the study and writing the manuscript. Once submitted the order cannot be changed without written consent of all the contributors.

The journal prescribes a maximum number of authors for manuscripts depending upon the type of manuscript, its scope and number of institutions involved vide infra. The authors should provide a justification, if the number of authors exceeds these limits.

Contribution Details Contributors should provide a description of contributions made by each of them towards the manuscript. Description should be divided in following categories, as applicable: One or more author should take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole from inception to published article and should be designated as 'guarantor'.

Authors should also disclose conflict of interest with products that compete with those mentioned in their manuscript. Submission of Manuscripts All manuscripts must be submitted on-line through the website http: First time users will have to register at this site.

Registration is free but mandatory.For Peer Review Week, researchers from across the spectrum offer advice and insights about how to review research manuscripts.

Urology Annals is a peer-reviewed international journal, published under the uspesis of the Saudi Urological Association. The journal's full text is available online at journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.

Peer Review Form for Research Papers Using the following checklist, complete a review of a classmate’s paper: PEER REVIEW STUDENT CHECKLIST #1. What do you think is the main idea of this piece? #2. What is the thesis statement in this essay? paper. Author: cfoster.

The Psychopathy Checklist or Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, now the Psychopathy Checklist—revised (PCL-R), is a psychological assessment tool most commonly used to assess the presence of psychopathy in individuals.

It is a item inventory of perceived personality traits and recorded behaviors, intended to be completed on the basis of a semi-structured interview along with a review .

MLA Formatting and Style Guide

The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Medical oncology, radiation oncology, medical imaging, .

RESEARCH PAPER CHECKLIST Name INTRODUCTION: My introduction gets the reader’s attention right from the beginning. _____ Some background information is .

Psychopathy Checklist - Wikipedia