Through his experiences growing up, Jim discovers that he cannot act alone nor rely on the teaching of a church in order to change society. He discovers that this political group may provide the answers he needs. When describing his initial exposure to members of the Communist Party is states: They were quiet, and they were working; but in the back of every mind there was conviction that sooner or later they would win their way out of the system they hated.
After verbalizing his own feelings, Jim laughs and smiles for the first time since the reader meets him. For example, when Jim is walking with Mac, the white park lights cast ominous black shadows. Steinbeck continues to pair black and white images when Mac and Jim find the tent of the apple-pickers unofficial leader, London.
Jim is so concerned with the future that he forgets about the individuals that he is supposedly fighting for. When the light is too bright, it becomes oppressive. When Steinbeck describes light, he often uses very violent adjectives.
Comparing an everyday street sign to a bomb indicates that Jim himself feels ready to burst due his lack of action to remedy an oppressive political system. Steinbeck continues to use these vehement adjectives to describe the light.
The light is usually dangerous, but on the other hand, the darkness is often a source of safety. For instance, Jim sleeps soundly in the dark train on the way to the apple-pickers valley.
Furthermore, anti-communist vigilantes will shoot at light during the night. Instead of providing them a haven, the light actually makes them a target therefore they find refuge in the dark. When they are in the Anderson home, they have to cover the windows with curtains However, the imagery of darkness that Steinbeck utilizes is not always positive.
But Jim becomes defensive, arguing that he has no need for religion. At the height of his fever, Jim becomes almost god-like, persuading even London to follow his orders.
Jim tells London to organize a police group to punish anyone who tries to escape or falls asleep. He changes so much that he frightens Mac. Through Jim, Steinbeck illustrates the hazards of complete political single-mindedness. Jim is willing to use any means necessary in order to mobilize the people to strike even if it means transforming their camp into a dictatorship.
Jim becomes so extreme that he does not even wish to discuss his decisions.
He says to the doctor: You build a trap of words and then you fall into it. Jim is even willing to rip a part his bandages in order to arouse the men into action. According to Mac, Party members cannot allow emotion to dictate their actions even though he allowed himself to become too close to Jim.
Despite the surfacing of a kind of religious fundamentalism in Jim, he has doubts about his actions.In Dubious Battle study guide contains a biography of John Steinbeck, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
About In Dubious Battle In Dubious Battle Summary.
In Dubious Battle is a novel by John Steinbeck, written in The central figure of the story is an activist attempting to organize abused laborers in order to gain fair wages and working conditions.
One writer of this kind is John Steinbeck in the novel In Dubious Battle. It takes place in the 's when Franklin Deleanor Roosevelt was President. The story is set in a small, rural, part of California, which is known as the Torgas Valley.
One writer of this kind is John Steinbeck in the novel In Dubious Battle. It takes place in the 's when Franklin Deleanor Roosevelt was President.
The story is set in a small, rural, part of California, which is known as the Torgas Valley. In John Steinbeck’s In Dubious Battle, Mac describes the Party’s methodology when he says: “You get a hell of a drive out of something that has some meaning to .
Dubious Battle, by John Steinbeck. Specifically, it will focus upon how characters represent the various ideas held by capital and labor by the 's.
"In Dubious Battle" is the story of poor field workers fighting a lost cause against prosperous owners.